We noticed you haven't updated your profile picture recently. We've upgraded your profile to allow for richer hi-resolution images. We invite you to take a moment to upload a new image that represents you in the community!
I am struggling with my co-workers, admin, county, state wanting to use standardized tests and making them mandatory. I don't teach that way with labs and projects and use rubrics and other ways to formatively assess them. How do other teachers address this? Our state does not have high pressure testing but it still reflects and then this year they can use scores in our evaluations now.
1880 Activity Points
The original purpose of standardized tests was to provide a means to make sure that all students had an opportunity to learn the same minimum content. It is a great shame that they have been misused and misapplied.
Another misconception concerning standardized tests is that they are all on bubble sheets - the NAEP tests contain both questions (some m/c, some essay) as well as hands-on performance-based problems - just what you are preparing your students for!
That said, just because you teach hands-on, it does not mean you should not prepare your students for standardized (bubble) tests, because, like it or not, they will be taking them for science at some point in their academic careers. In my state, they have to pass a standardized test in biology to graduate and some of your students may, at some point, take an advanced placement test. Multiple choice and short or long answer essay questions can be written that address higher order thinking skills, it just takes some care and practice.
And some are already available to you online. If you do a search in the Learning Center for NAEP there are links to 16 webseminars that provide both interpretation of NAEP test results AND links to sample questions that have already been used and validated at various grade levels. There are also links to the website where additional questions can be found. Perhaps, instead of giving tests, you could incorporate these questions into entry/exit questions or class reviews over topics - that way you could be preparing your students to answer standardized test-style questions without sacrificing your class time to long drawn-out tests. And the results could be useful to you for diagnostic or formative purposes, as well.
If you have time to take a course in designing assessment, it is a worthwhile use of time. If not, there are a number of good introductory materials here in the Learning Center. Hands-on inquiry teaching is good but using a variety of assessment tools makes sure we don't miss recognizing student alternative conceptions.
65805 Activity Points
I would make sure that the students engage in real argumentation. Student should justify their results from hands-on activities with real data. If this is done they should be able to master any real time testing for higher order thinking skills.
There are lots of LC info on argumentation. I will include some from my collection.
101510 Activity Points
As I think about the implementation of the NGSS, the thoughts by the first poster about standardized tests pose some real questions??? The Next Generation Science Standards are made up of the science and engineering practices, the cross-cutting concepts as well as the disciplinary core ideas. I do not think we know how to assess all 3 pieces at once. I think we should be developing portfolios, maybe electronic, science notebooks..having students create quality explanations for why something happens. I guess I am questioning the use of standardized assessments as we know them in a new era of learning.
34035 Activity Points
Forum content is subject to the same rules as NSTA List Serves. Rules and disclaimers